Bitcoin-holdingselskaper vil bli utsatt for høyere overholdelseskostnader når Joe Biden blir fungerende president i USA. Det mener Ripples konsernsjef Brad Garlinghouse.

Brad Garlinghouse mener at bitcoinholdingselskaper snart vil bli påvirket av ny policy fra den Biden-ledede administrasjonen.

Bitcoin vil være underlagt retningslinjer for styring av klimaendringer

I følge en tweet mandag 9. november 2020, har Ripple-sjef Brad Garlinghouse sett for seg at Bitcoin-holdingselskaper kan komme under kontroll når Biden-administratoren begynner å gjennomføre retningslinjene for styring av klimaendringer. Ripples hode sa at selskaper som er hovedmenn av den største kryptovalutaen etter markedsverdi, ville bli laget for å avsløre operasjoner knyttet til klimaendringer.

I nyere tid har Profit Revolution sett økende institusjonell adopsjon, med bedrifter som foretrekker flaggskipskrypto til fiat-valuta. Bedrifter som Microstrategy og Square gjorde Bitcoin til et reservekapital.

I mellomtiden, med Biden, forventes det at den valgte presidenten i USA kan reversere Trumps dereguleringspolitikk om klimaendringer. Dette kan bety at kryptorelaterte virksomheter vil møte ytterligere overholdelse hvis Bidens miljøvernplaner er på plass.

Garlinghouse’s kommentarer er de siste i Ripple-konsernsjefen som utråber XRP som et bedre alternativ til proof-of-work (PoW) -nettverk som bitcoin. Tilbake i oktober introduserte selskapet EW Zero, en betalingsløsning for fornybar energi for blockchain.

Klimaendringsledelse på agendaen for finansielle tjenester

Tidligere sendte New Yorks finansielle regulator, New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), et brev til alle selskaper, inkludert kryptokursfirmaer som opererer i statene. I følge brevet ba NYDFS selskaper være oppmerksomme på klimaendringsrisikoen mens de tok skritt for å redusere slike risikofaktorer.

I Storbritannia kunngjorde det britiske statskassen i november sine planer om å gjøre det obligatorisk for finansinstitusjoner og store selskaper å avsløre klimarisikorapporter innen 2025. Mens landet administrerer nedfallet fra Brexit og COVID-19, ser den britiske regjeringen opprette et „netto-karbon-land innen 2050“.

Der Bitcoin-holdingselskaper kan møte klimaendringsbasert gransking, er Ripple ikke unntatt fra regulatoriske problemer i USA. Faktisk er selskapet angivelig desillusjonert av kryptolovene i landet og vurderer å flytte til utlandet.

Tilbake i september ble 48 stater enige om et enhetlig regelverk for pengesendere i en utvikling som kan være nettopositiv for krypto- og fintech-virksomheter.

Wird Bitcoin das Nachbeben spüren, wenn Trump in den Umfragen gegen Biden antritt?

Wahlzeit!

Der Kampf zwischen “ Sleepy “ Joe Biden und “ Tiny Hands “ Trump wird heute Abend bei den Wahlen und vielleicht in den kommenden Wochen vor Gericht ausgetragen. Aber was macht das mit Bitcoin und wie stapelt sich die Wahl 2020 bis zur letzten Wahl?

Laut CoinMarketCap, einer Messdaten-Website, liegt der Preis von Bitcoin am Wahltag bei 13.685 USD, was einem Anstieg von 1,82% in den letzten 24 Stunden entspricht.

Die Top 5 Crypto News & Features in Ihrem Posteingang jeden Tag

Holen Sie sich Daily Digest für das Beste aus Decrypt. Nachrichten, originelle Features und mehr.
Deine E-Mail

In der Wahlnacht 2016, als Präsident Trump “ Crazy / Crooked / Lyin ‚ “ Hillary Clinton besiegte , betrug der Preis für eine einzelne Bitcoin 700 US-Dollar. Nach Trumps Sieg schoss Bitcoin auf 735 Dollar. Das ist eine 18-fache Preiserhöhung für Bitcoin in den letzten vier Jahren.

Und wie wäre es mit 2012, als “ Cheatin ‚“ Obama den “ Choke-Künstler “ Mitt Romney besiegte? Die Daten sind verschwommen, aber Bitcoin war im Oktober etwa 11,2 USD und im November 12,56 USD pro Statista wert . Für diejenigen, die Bitcoin schon vor langer Zeit gekauft haben sollten, ist das eine 1000-fache Preiserhöhung seit Obamas zweiter Amtszeit.

Nicht zuletzt zeigen die enormen Preisunterschiede, wie viel sich zwischen den Wahlen ändern kann.

Während Amerika diesen Monat die Grundlagen seiner Demokratie testet, werden auch Bitcoin-Händler neue Preise testen. Im vergangenen Monat stieg der Preis von Bitcoin von etwa 10.500 USD zu Beginn des Monats auf Höchststände von etwas mehr als 14.000 USD am Wochenende.

El gobierno iraní ha obligado a los mineros de bitcoin (BTC) en el país a vender sus monedas al estado, por lo que las autoridades pueden usar la moneda digital para pagar las importaciones en medio de sanciones internacionales paralizantes, según informes del 30 de octubre de 2020.

Irán espera en Bitcoin

Si bien Irán es uno de los países más ricos del mundo en lo que respecta a la producción de petróleo crudo y gas natural, la economía del Estado Islámico ha sido casi paralizada por las sanciones internacionales, así como por la pandemia de COVID-19 que redujo su producción diaria de petróleo de 3,1 millones. barriles a apenas 1,9 millones.

En un intento por aliviar sus dificultades económicas y generar fondos para el pago de importaciones, el Ministerio de Energía y el Banco Central de Irán han promulgado una legislación que obliga a los mineros de bitcoins registrados en la región a vender sus monedas a la estado.

Se recordará que el gobierno de Irán oficialmente legalizado operaciones mineras de criptomonedas en agosto de 2019 e hizo obligatorio que los mineros obtengan la licencia necesaria del Ministerio de Industria, Minas y Comercio

Por fuentes Cerca del último desarrollo, Irán, que recientemente cambió su moneda de reserva principal del dólar estadounidense al yuan chino, ya que ya no puede acceder a sus reservas en dólares estadounidenses, ha visto caer sus reservas extranjeras en más del 33 por ciento en los últimos 24 meses. y ahora está buscando formas de cambiar su cada vez menor fortuna.

Si bien bitcoin (BTC) y otras criptomonedas son completamente diferentes de las monedas fiduciarias globales, el gobierno iraní espera que la naturaleza sin fronteras de las primeras le facilite pagar a sus socios comerciales internacionales.

Aunque el gobierno aún no ha publicado más detalles sobre la medida, la CBI ha insinuado que los mineros deberán enviar los criptos directamente a canales específicos que se les proporcionarán.

Con el precio de bitcoin (BTC) ahora apuntando a la luna una vez más, queda por ver si el gobierno iraní podrá comprar las monedas a los mineros a una tasa razonable que hará del acuerdo un escenario en el que todas las partes ganen.

La postura de Irán sobre las criptomonedas sigue sin estar clara, ya que el gobierno regulaciones con respecto a la floreciente clase de activos digitales no puede describirse como completamente aceptable, sin embargo, la nueva alianza podría cambiar las cosas, especialmente si la nación amortigua con éxito los efectos adversos de su sanción internacional a través de bitcoin.

With great influence comes great responsibility. Unfortunately, YouTube seems to ignore this.

Last weekend, I was watching a sports stream on YouTube. Talented and fearless athletes on the screen, a glass of wine in one hand and a cat purring underneath the other, you know, those perfect Saturday afternoons. If only streaming wasn’t interrupted every few minutes by annoying ads. They usually come in a series of two ads that are played in a row, which can be skipped after five seconds.

Just when I was thinking of subscribing to a paid version to free myself from learning more about flying detergents, half-eaten doughnuts, striped slippers and the best tampons ever, I saw the following:

„To verify your address, just send 0.5 to 200 ETH to the address below and get 1 to 400 ETH (x2 back)“.

This tired old proposition, which would offend anyone slightly familiar with the world of cryptomone technology (including my grandmother), was accompanied by a video interview with Changpeng Zhao of Binance taken from what appears to be a Forbes event. The shot was embellished with the Ethereum and Binance logos.

A suitably ambiguous policy

If I want to post a video of my little nephew dancing to a pop song, he risks being quickly blocked for violating intellectual property rights. Is that fair? Possibly.

When an educational streaming video on crypto currency is organised by Cointelegraph or a crypto currency vlogger, it runs the risk of being blocked for „harmful content“, which has happened several times this year so far. This is ridiculous.

If people keep falling for Elon Musk’s fake scams offering Bitcoin Millionaire (BTC) from countless fake accounts created specifically to cheat, it’s not YouTube’s responsibility. OK, I totally agree; everyone needs to do their own research when making any investment decision. But no one seems to be responsible for the ads that YouTube exposes its audience to. Atrocious.

The fact that the largest video hosting platform of our time is brazenly allowing itself to promote scams is deeply unfair. This brings to mind the Roman expression of pecunia non olet – that money does not stink, regardless of whether it is generated through human waste or exploitative practices. Whether it stinks or not, an unpleasant aftertaste lingers and will not be easily forgotten.

It is truly sad that one of the world’s most prominent technology companies freely puts its base of two billion users at risk by promoting crooks and scammers. Despite all the prosperity of YouTube, the platform has not bothered to implement a sufficient scam verification process for its sales team. It is highly unprofessional for such an influential organisation to lack clear policies on what advertising content is deemed suitable for monetisation.

As a journalist, I am very sensitive to bad media practices that promote bad actors, especially in the sensitive area of new technologies, where the difference between a promising project and a scam could define the sustainability of the industry. The media’s job is to double-check everything they report to the world, use reliable sources and apply scam-checking tools when necessary. Partnerships and sales should reflect the same approach.

As a user, I see no difference between harmful content and annoying scam ads placed on videos. It plays on my trust, puts my material well-being at risk and, when not harmful, is downright offensive by assuming a lack of common sense in your audience.

YouTube fails its users

This is what can be found on the YouTube website: „The safety of our creators, viewers and partners is our highest priority, and we hope that each of you will help us protect this unique and vibrant community. It is important that you understand our Community Guidelines, and the role they play in our shared responsibility to keep YouTube safe. Please take the time to carefully read the policy below. The policy clarifies:

„YouTube does not allow spam, scams or other deceptive practices that take advantage of the YouTube community. Nor do we allow content whose primary purpose is to mislead others into leaving YouTube for another site.“

It appears that one of the most influential centralised services is failing to meet its own standards which it recommends to its users for careful consideration. While the YouTube community either abides by the rules or is punished for not complying, the company gives itself a free pass when it does not follow its policy. This raises a big question as to its value to the community. Perhaps it is time to empower users and give them the right to enjoy transparent and decentralised video-hosting platforms.

With great influence comes great responsibility. It is a pity that a service used by more than 70% of US Internet users chooses to ignore that.

1000 $ investis dans Bitcoin le 1er janvier valent 1439 $ à compter d’aujourd’hui. En fait, au moment de la rédaction de cet article, le prix de Bitcoin atteignait 43,9% des rendements cumulatifs. Ergo, il n’est pas surprenant qu’il soit populaire en tant qu’investissement alternatif dans les cercles de gestion d’actifs. Malgré la récente baisse du prix du Bitcoin Code en dessous de 11500 $, la demande est soutenue, le BTC se négociant de plus en plus près de son juste prix. Donc, si vous rééquilibrez votre crypto-portefeuille, il est important de trouver des réponses à des questions clés telles que,

Bitcoin est-il une star ou un chien et, quelle est l’attente de profit moyen?

La matrice des parts de croissance, conçue par Bruce D. Henderson pour le Boston Consulting Group en 1970, peut contenir la réponse aux questions susmentionnées. Maintenant, la première question peut sembler absurde pour certains d’entre vous, mais croyez-moi, ce n’est pas le cas, car les réponses à la même question seront dérivées d’une version de cette matrice. Bien que la matrice de part de croissance soit un outil courant dans le secteur de la finance, elle peut également être utilisée par les traders Bitcoin.

Considérez ceci – Avec des ajustements mineurs tels que le remplacement de la génération de trésorerie par une domination du marché sur l’axe des y et l’utilisation de l’argent par un retour sur investissement (YTD) sur l’axe des x, la matrice BCG d’un Crypto Trader peut être formulée.

Bitcoin est-il une star ou un chien?

La matrice BCG originale associe un marché à forte croissance comme nécessitant potentiellement un investissement net de trésorerie élevé. Cependant, dans ce cas, au lieu d’analyser le produit sur la base de l’investissement net en espèces, le retour sur investissement YTD sera évalué. Pour la même chose, l’hypothèse sous-jacente sera que Bitcoin a été acheté en début d’année le 1er janvier 2020 au prix de 7215,99 $.

Le besoin de part de marché est d’identifier le revenu potentiel généré par le produit. Par conséquent, lors du rééquilibrage d’un portefeuille, il est tout à fait logique d’examiner les produits en fonction de la domination du marché de l’actif. Par conséquent, tous les systèmes de gauche seront systématiquement rentables et ceux de droite pourraient entraîner des pertes à court ou à long terme.

Désormais, la matrice d’origine contient des animaux et des éléments comme un point d’interrogation et une étoile comme étiquettes pour les actifs. Pour nos besoins, une idée juste des bénéfices moyens et du volume quotidien peut être utilisée lors de l’extrapolation de ces éléments pour s’intégrer dans l’évaluation des crypto-actifs comme Bitcoin.

Alors qu’est-ce qu’une «étoile»? Eh bien, une étoile est un actif qui a un volume quotidien élevé et qui génère des bénéfices élevés, selon la matrice BCG du Crypto Trader.

De même, un «chien» correspond à un faible RoI et à une faible domination du marché. Désormais, traditionnellement, une telle caractérisation s’appliquerait à un actif à ses débuts, mais elle peut également s’appliquer à Bitcoin, mais pas parfaitement.

Pensez-y: le RoI de Bitcoin, au moment de la rédaction de cet article, était supérieur à 46% depuis le début de l’année et sa domination du marché était de 55,8%. Ce sont tous deux de bons chiffres, mais ce que ces chiffres ne révèlent pas, c’est le fait que ces chiffres ont considérablement baissé au cours des derniers mois. La domination du marché, par exemple, est passée de 68% en janvier 2020, tandis que le RoI était beaucoup plus élevé lorsque Bitcoin frappait à la porte de la barre des 12000 dollars. Même si nous tenons compte du fait que les RoI ne cessent de changer, nous devrons tenir compte de la si mauvaise position dominante du marché, une observation qui caractériserait un actif comme Bitcoin comme un «point d’interrogation».

Being rewarded for becoming a pirate – The US tax authorities seem strongly annoyed at the idea of ​​not being able to monitor all crypto transactions, the purpose of which is precisely to better preserve the privacy of their users. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has just launched an offer to de-anonymize these transactions, with no less than $ 625,000 at stake.

Monero, a haunt of malicious actors for the IRS?

After the Pentagon and the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), it is now the Internal Revenue Service which is launching a call for tenders to further improve the supervision of cryptocurrencies .

In the explanatory note of the offer, the IRS notes that currently, the investigative tools of the American authorities are too „limited“ to be able to trace anonymous transactions .

This applies both on blockchains anonymously vocation as Monero (XMR) or second layer solutions such as network Lightning of Bitcoin

Regarding Monero, it is above all the increase in ransomware that concerns the US tax service. In fact, the hackers behind this malware now demand more ransom payments in XMR :

“The use of privacy-focused cryptocurrencies is growing, and there is also an increase in their use by illicit actors. For example, in April 2020, a RaaS (Ransomware as a Service) group called Sodinokibi (or REvil) said that future ransom demand payments will be in Monero (XMR) rather than Bitcoin (BTC) ( …). “

Sidechain and off-chain transactions also in the IRS ’sights

All of the second-layer solutions also seem to be of concern to the US tax authorities.

Indeed, although Lightning Labs is developing a monitoring application for Bitcoin’s Lightning Network (LN) (called Lndmon ), the IRS explains that there is no such means of monitoring for „other distributed ledgers (for example). example, the Litecoin blockchain), Raiden Network (on the Ethereum platform), etc. “ .

However, the IRS wants to be able to investigate all potentially illicit activities of these networks parallel to the main blockchains.

This is why the tax administration wishes to finance a project in 2 phases, for a total of 625,000 dollars . The first phase will consist of presenting the proof of concept of a tool that would make it easier to trace all the types of transactions mentioned above. Phase 2 will then consist in carrying out pilot tests of this monitoring software.

Interested developers and companies have until September 16 to apply.

If the IRS achieves these ends, it will take away much of the interest inherent in anonymous cryptocurrencies, like Monero. Although a little less serious for second-layer solutions (because the scalability / speed of transactions is the main interest), it will deprive them of an asset that was precisely lacking in their main blockchain.